Why are you defending
Prince Ahmed now? Why not when
Posner first came out with the
story last Fall?
In our culture, values
such as honor and pride are
very important. So while the
family was sickened by the allegations,
we didn’t feel it was
up to us to have to prove his
innocence. We just hoped it
would go away. But obviously,
with all the attention paid
to Unger’s book, it hasn’t.
What do you want? What
needs to occur to clear Prince
Ahmed’s name?
We want the truth to be
told. We want it acknowledged
and an end put to this. And
in the future, we hope that
authors will not consider including
weakly attributed information.
As reported in Unger’s
book, Prince Ahmed left the country
shortly after 9/11.
Yes, he did. But as has
been widely reported throughout
the media, the 9/11 Commission
looked at the departure of Saudi
nationals from the U.S. after
9/11 and has officially stated
there was no problem with it.
It’s a non-story.
What did Prince Ahmed
think of the American people?
He was educated in America
and he loved America and the
American people. He was not
the least bit political. He
was a businessman who loved
horses and loved his wife and
five children. There is absolutely
no evidence nor motivation for
Prince Ahmed to have been involved
in any way with Al-Qaeda. Even
Posner, the source of this whole
conspiracy theory, admitted
that Ahmed was very pro-American.
Gerald Posner (and Unger)
claim they got their information
about Zubaydah’s interrogation
from two reliable US government
sources. Do you have government
or other sources willing to contradict
their account?
Vince Cannistraro is a
27-year veteran of the CIA and
the former head of counterterrorism.
He has stated publicly that
Posner’s account is blatantly
false and that perhaps Posner’s
sources used him as a means
to an end.
Saudi Arabia claimed
that Prince Ahmed died of a heart
attack in his bed shortly after
he returned home. He was only
43. Did he have any health problems
he was being treated for?
He had a pre-existing condition, one he had received treatment for in a U.S. hospital. Ultimately, he died from complications related to treatment for this condition.
In his book, Posner claims
that all, except for one, of the
men fingered by Zubaydah eventually
ended up dead. Don’t you
see how some would interpret that
as more than a coincidence, as
some sort of conspiracy? Especially,
given the circumstances of their
deaths.
That’s how conspiracy
theories get started. You connect
a series of dots that on the
surface seem to add up to something.
But there are explanations for
all of the deaths Posner thinks
are somehow related. And the
facts behind their deaths are
not the least bit conspiratorial.
It’s somewhat ironic because
Posner made a living debunking
conspiracy theories and then
he turns around and creates
one with less compelling evidence
than the ones he has sought
to dispel.
Why do think government
sources contacted Posner with
these explosive allegations? What
agenda would they have had?
There
are some in the U.S. who want
to harm US-Saudi relations and
are giving things to journalists
all the time. Posner was likely
used by those with this agenda.
Even the former head of the
CIA’s counterterrorism
unit, Vince Cannistraro, has
indicated that’s probably
what happened.
What kind of man was
Prince Ahmed? Who were his friends?
Prince Ahmed was a family
man, a gentleman, and a successful
businessman. He had many American
friends, especially in horse
racing. He was even the godfather
to the daughter of one of his
thoroughbred trainers.
Does the prince’s
family have plans to release their
own book to counter Posner’s
and Ungers?
Not at this time. But we
are exploring other ways to
remember him for who he really
was rather than as the subject
of some wild conspiracy theory.
Has the family attempted
to speak with each author and
meet with them personally?
No. We have no reason or
desire to speak with someone
who is so careless with the
truth and with someone’s
name and reputation. This is
about one man, his family and
the pursuit of truth. It’s
not about any individual personality.